Anne Curzan, guest speaker in the 2014 TED talks, discusses the origin of common-day words. She relays an inside view into the mind of an dictionary editor, being one herself, and offers that language is determined by the general populous. She presents the idea that, in order to be real, a word would only need to be commonly used among the people.
I agree. She further explains that dictionary editors often feel flustered in trying to keep up with the change in words, and dread placing undeserved importance on words that only become fads in the end. Because of our tech savvy world, new words such as "app", and the prefix "e-" have become second nature. These are commonly used, and have now been counted officially into the dictionary:
Humans have a unique ability to continue creating new words, expanding upon what is already existing. If a word is created, and continues to be used, it will eventually become part of the common vocabulary. The general public has always decided which words are real or not, whether they were concious of it or not.
"Anne introduces the point that language is not based on personal opinion..." Indeed. This is something that the "prescribers" at Lake Superior State University seem to have forgotten. Or rather, something they probably wish wasn't true. Their list of "banished" words--their idea that they can prescribe our language--just makes me shake my head. Well, they probably know that they can't, the list is really just a list of things that the various contributors PERSONALLY dislike. But as Ms Curzan says, and as you reiterate, that's not the way language works.
ReplyDelete